tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23241716.post8788414514273382769..comments2009-09-12T09:37:06.965-04:00Justinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07697776280178146413justin@basement-dwellers.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23241716.post-3755402420594207262009-09-12T09:37:06.965-04:002009-09-12T09:37:06.965-04:00Ok, creepy. :)Justinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07697776280178146413noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23241716.post-32807635782935388842009-09-11T19:51:14.627-04:002009-09-11T19:51:14.627-04:00You are no longer anonymous Justin MerryDave from Louisvillehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02699384821389899745noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23241716.post-86290434100898972922009-09-11T10:51:45.067-04:002009-09-11T10:51:45.067-04:00I played with cost of living adjustments a bit. The short story is that it does make a difference, but the trend between beer price and winning % remains (though it&#39;s not as strong).<br /><br />The WSJ didn&#39;t want to the CoL stuff because I was using data from a CNN site, and I didn&#39;t feel like messing getting another data source.<br />-jJustinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07697776280178146413noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23241716.post-45684496101647234212009-09-11T10:08:20.498-04:002009-09-11T10:08:20.498-04:00Well done, Justin. Assuming there is some correlation with winning % and market size and that larger markets are generally more expensive places to live, shouldn&#39;t we expect higher beer prices from winning teams? -KenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com