tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23241716.post3956687945170700266..comments2012-02-02T07:31:29.833-05:00Justinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07697776280178146413noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23241716.post-52651533866608867132011-12-20T09:28:44.991-05:002011-12-20T09:28:44.991-05:00Fixed. I&#39;m leaving LeCure there, as I disagree that he has no shot there. Though I agree that his success in the bullpen certainly does make him a likely candidate to stay there.Justinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08016076689013194183noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23241716.post-51468638339216096492011-12-19T23:04:08.899-05:002011-12-19T23:04:08.899-05:00Oops on Maloney! Will fix in the morning.<br /><br />Chapman: I think I sort of forgot about him too. I know the Reds are saying they will give him a shot in the rotation. I&#39;d like to believe them, but I think they will be too enamored with the idea of him closing out games with CoCo hopefully gone. For that reason, I have a hard time remembering to keep him in my rotation thoughts.<br /><br />If they do give him a shot and he can hack it, he obviously has a chance to be great. Or, at least league average. I hope they do, because he&#39;s the kind of player who could be a difference maker.Justinnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23241716.post-37754481917971049382011-12-19T22:42:29.909-05:002011-12-19T22:42:29.909-05:00Well for one, matt maloney is no longer with the Reds. Secondly, LeCure is not a rotation candidate. Fully in the bullpen and has been since last May. That #6 spot for rotation depth should read Wood/Chapman as of today.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23241716.post-33644819732064461062011-12-19T22:09:27.143-05:002011-12-19T22:09:27.143-05:00Simulator has it as STL, MIL, CIN in that order with the Reds picking up right around 3 wins with the Latos signing since he was not replacing a 0 WAR starting pitcher.Xeifrankhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15904090174534262598noreply@blogger.com